Average user rating - 1.429 out of 5.

 

BudmanMT (1) on December 11, 2007 wrote:

0 out of 1 people found this review helpful:
An American tradition!

 

IndestructibleLiver (8) on October 15, 2007 wrote:

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful:
Water is defined as colourless, tasteless and odorless. Bud seems to have some kind of a yellow blurry, so maybe it's no water. Bud seems to have some kind of a brew taste... very little, but there it is, so... well, maybe is no water. And I never smelled a Bud, but I think it has to be some vey very subtle fragance. Considering this three experiments, I have to say that, perhaps, maybe, I think Bud isn't water. But just maybe...

 

nathanm (22) on May 13, 2007 wrote:

0 out of 1 people found this review helpful:
Decent beer, not as good as their other products, but better than anything from Miller.

 

Bufford (100) on February 14, 2007 wrote:

1 out of 1 people found this review helpful:
On a very hot day if I'm very thirsty it's great. Fortunately those days are extremely rare. If you're into weak yellow beer this is the one for you.

 

alain314 (2) on February 13, 2007 wrote:

1 out of 2 people found this review helpful:
The saddest beer I ever drunk. That was in San Francisco and I had suddenly a huge nostalgia for my Belgian motherland.

 

enygma (43) on March 08, 2006 wrote:

1 out of 2 people found this review helpful:
I'm going to have to agree with several other reviewers here - this beer is "beer" only by the lowest rank of the word. It's brewed, it's got alcohol in it, and it's not completely clear. Other than that, there's nothing good to say.

Unfortunately, those running the local sports arenas haven't quite seemed to catch on to those that have a bit higher taste in beer - I can sometimes at least find Shiner, but that's few and far between.

 

usonian (23) on March 06, 2006 wrote:

0 out of 1 people found this review helpful:
I would rate this beer zero if I could... full of adjuncts like rice, and probably scientifically engineered to include the smallest possible amount of hops and malt possible for it to legally qualify as 'beer'. One star for their nice horses, I guess.

 

michael (36) on March 03, 2006 wrote:

1 out of 2 people found this review helpful:
In my opinion, this is the best of the generic beers, but that's not really saying much.

 

MP (30) on September 29, 2005 wrote:

1 out of 3 people found this review helpful:
Probably the worst beer on the planet.